President Trump’s threats to retake ownership of the Panama Canal reflects its importance for US trade and the country’s strategic interests. It’s possible that these threats are simply another attempt to gain concessions, such as lower fees charged to the US. And even if Trump were to follow through, it’s unlikely that there would be major direct implications for the global economy or inflation, given that the Panama Canal only accounts for about 5% of global sea trade. The bigger implications would be the extent to which this influences global fracturing, which will shape trade relations for decades to come.
Become a client to read more
This is premium content that requires an active Capital Economics subscription to view.
Already have an account?
You may already have access to this premium content as part of a paid subscription.
Sign in to read the content in full or get details of how you can access it
Register for free
Sign up for a free account to:
- Unlock additional content
- Register for Capital Economics events
- Receive email updates and economist-curated newsletters
- Request a free trial of our services