Skip to main content

Cutting the IOER rate would be too risky

Cutting the interest on excess reserves (IOER) rate may seem like a simple way for the Fed to signal its intent to leave short rates at near-zero for several more years, at the same time as it begins to taper its asset purchases. However, even a small reduction could trigger a sequence of potentially troublesome events. If the Fed is determined to cut the IOER rate it might make sense to leave the rate payable on required reserves unchanged at 0.25%. That would at least give banks an incentive to expand their balance sheets by making more loans.

Become a client to read more

This is premium content that requires an active Capital Economics subscription to view.

Already have an account?

You may already have access to this premium content as part of a paid subscription.

Sign in to read the content in full or get details of how you can access it

Register for free

Sign up for a free account to:

  • Unlock additional content
  • Register for Capital Economics events
  • Receive email updates and economist-curated newsletters
  • Request a free trial of our services


Get access