Skip to main content

How did we get employment so badly wrong?

The unexpected 2.5 million rebound in nonfarm payroll employment in May, against a consensus expectation of a 7.5 million decline, has generated a lot of speculation that the figures were either manipulated for political reasons or juiced by firms temporarily rehiring workers to ensure that their Paycheck Protection Program loans convert into grants. With hindsight, however, the weekly continuing claims figures were probably providing an overly bearish gauge of labour market conditions – with the boost to unemployment payments prompting more people than normal to claim.

Become a client to read more

This is premium content that requires an active Capital Economics subscription to view.

Already have an account?

You may already have access to this premium content as part of a paid subscription.

Sign in to read the content in full or get details of how you can access it

Register for free

Sign up for a free account to:

  • Unlock additional content
  • Register for Capital Economics events
  • Receive email updates and economist-curated newsletters
  • Request a free trial of our services


Get access