Skip to main content

Is a Universal Basic Income feasible?

The idea of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) in India has gained attention in recent weeks. While a UBI could go a long way towards eradicating poverty and reducing the problems with the current welfare system, its high fiscal cost and a lack of necessary financial infrastructure make it implausible for now. While there is merit to introducing a UBI, there are major problems. The most obvious is the large fiscal cost. The Economic Survey estimates that a UBI of INR7,620 (US$113) a year would almost completely eradicate absolute poverty in India. This appears to be a low number, given that the World Bank’s definition of the global poverty line equates to over US$600 a year. Nevertheless, even if we use the numbers from the Economic Survey, a payment of INR7,620 a year to all of India’s 1.25bn people would cost around INR10trn per annum, equivalent to 8% of GDP. Subsidy expenditure was worth 1.7% of GDP in FY15/16, while we estimate that other welfare programmes (such as the child development and rural income schemes) totalled another 3% of GDP. Even if these existing programmes were totally scrapped and replaced by the UBI, this would still leave an additional cost of 3.3% of GDP. This is almost as large as the existing budget deficit.

Become a client to read more

This is premium content that requires an active Capital Economics subscription to view.

Already have an account?

You may already have access to this premium content as part of a paid subscription.

Sign in to read the content in full or get details of how you can access it

Register for free

Sign up for a free account to:

  • Unlock additional content
  • Register for Capital Economics events
  • Receive email updates and economist-curated newsletters
  • Request a free trial of our services


Get access